Skip to main content
Home/Tools/Compare/n8n vs Make
n8n logo
n8nBest for developers & self-hosting
VS
Make logo
MakeBest visual automation builder

n8n vs Make (2026)

n8n vs Make (Integromat): Open-source power vs visual automation platform

Updated May 2026Hands-on tested · Affiliate disclosure belowIndependent editorial review

Overall winner: n8n

n8n is the better choice for technical teams who want to self-host or build AI agent workflows. Make is better for users who want a visually intuitive automation builder at a lower cloud cost than Zapier.

Affiliate disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you click and purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Our editorial scores and recommendations are always independent.

VantageLabs Editorial Research Team
Reviewed by VantageLabs Editorial Research TeamUpdated May 2026Editorial standards

Side-by-side breakdown

Full Comparison

Feature
n8n logo
n8n
Make logo
Make
Starting price
Free self-hosted / $20/mo
Free / $9/mo Core
Free tier
Yes (self-hosted unlimited)
Yes (1,000 ops/mo)
Self-hostable
Yes
No
Visual interface
Node-based (technical)
Best-in-class visual flow
Integrations
400+ nodes
1,500+ apps
AI agent support
Yes (native nodes)
Limited
Open source
Yes
No
Data privacy (self-host)
Full control
Cloud only
Learning curve
Steep
Moderate
Cost at scale
Free self-hosted
Usage-based pricing
Winner in this category Tied / comparable

Our verdicts

Who Wins?

Overall winner

n8n logo
n8n

For technical teams wanting maximum flexibility, AI agents, and the ability to self-host for free, n8n is the stronger long-term platform despite its steeper learning curve.

Best value

n8n logo
n8n

n8n self-hosted is free with unlimited operations. Make's free tier provides 1,000 operations/month, which is more limiting for active automation workflows.

Best for beginners

Make logo
Make

Make's visual flow builder is more intuitive than n8n's node editor for users without programming experience. The learning curve is meaningfully lower.

Best for professionals

n8n logo
n8n

Technical teams who need AI agent workflows, custom code execution, and complete data privacy through self-hosting find n8n's capabilities more aligned with professional needs.

What actually matters

Key Differences

1

n8n is open source and self-hostable for free. Make is a proprietary cloud platform — you cannot run it on your own infrastructure.

2

Make's visual interface — with colorful, clearly connected modules — is considered the best visual automation builder available. n8n's node-based interface is powerful but less visually intuitive.

3

n8n has native AI agent nodes for building LLM-powered automations. Make's AI integration is possible but less natively integrated.

4

Make has 1,500+ app integrations covering more tools than n8n's 400+ nodes. For niche app integrations, Make often has an existing module while n8n requires custom HTTP nodes.

5

Make's pricing is operations-based — each action in a scenario counts as an operation. n8n self-hosted has no operation limits.

What you'll pay

Pricing Comparison

n8n logo
n8n
Free self-hosted / $20/mo cloud
Free tier available
Make logo
Make
Free / from $9.99/mo
Free tier available

n8n self-hosted is free with unlimited workflows. n8n cloud starts at $20/mo for 2,500 executions. Make's free plan provides 1,000 operations/month; Core plan is $9/mo for 10,000 operations; Pro is $16/mo for 10,000 operations with more features. Make is cheaper than Zapier but more expensive than n8n self-hosted at scale. For teams building complex, high-volume automations, n8n's self-hosted option is the most cost-effective by far.

In real-world use

Performance Analysis

Make's scenario execution is reliable and its visual debugging tools are excellent for identifying where automations fail. n8n cloud performance is comparable. Self-hosted n8n performance scales with your infrastructure. n8n handles complex data transformations and branching logic more efficiently for technical workflows. Make's visual interface makes it easier to optimise and maintain workflows visually. Both handle standard automations reliably.

n8n logo
n8n
4.6/5
Make logo
Make
4.5/5

Find your fit

Best Use Cases

n8n logo
Choose n8nif you're…
  • Technical teams who need self-hosted automation for data privacy
  • Developers building AI agent workflows with LLM integration
  • High-volume automation where cloud pricing becomes expensive
  • Open-source advocates who want community-governed infrastructure
  • Teams comfortable with server management who want unlimited free automation
Make logo
Choose Makeif you're…
  • Operations teams who want visual, easy-to-understand automation flows
  • Teams needing 1,500+ app integrations
  • Non-developers who find Zapier too simple but n8n too complex
  • Users who want visual debugging for complex multi-step scenarios
  • Teams looking for a Zapier alternative at lower cost without self-hosting

Pros & cons

Strengths & Weaknesses

n8n logo
n8n
Open-source with thriving community
Much cheaper than Zapier at scale
More powerful logic and data transforms
Steeper learning curve for complete beginners
Self-hosting requires some technical setup
Make logo
Make
Much cheaper than Zapier
More powerful logic
Great free tier
Steeper learning curve
Less apps than Zapier

Our call

Final Recommendation

For technical teams who want the most powerful, free, self-hostable automation platform, n8n is the clear choice. For teams who want a better visual builder than Zapier at a lower cost — without the complexity of self-hosting — Make is the right middle ground. Make is the best option for non-technical users who want more power than Zapier without n8n's technical requirements.

Choose n8n

Technical teams and developers who want open-source, self-hosted automation with AI agent capabilities and unlimited free executions.

Choose Make

Operations teams and non-developers who want the best visual automation builder at a reasonable price without managing server infrastructure.

Common questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Make (Integromat) easier than n8n?

Yes, significantly. Make's visual module interface is more intuitive and better for non-developers. n8n's node-based editor is more flexible but requires more technical understanding.

Is n8n better than Make for AI workflows?

Yes. n8n has dedicated AI agent nodes for LLM integration, memory management, and tool calling. Make can integrate with AI APIs but lacks n8n's native AI workflow architecture.

Can Make be self-hosted?

No. Make is a cloud-only platform. n8n is the main automation tool that offers both cloud and self-hosted deployment options, which is a decisive advantage for teams with data privacy requirements.

What happened to Integromat?

Integromat was rebranded to Make in 2022. The platform and functionality are the same — if you see references to Integromat in older tutorials, they refer to what is now Make.

VantageLabs Weekly Brief

Get the weekly VantageLabs Brief.

Independent tool picks, comparison insights, and workflow recommendations — delivered once a week.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.